Obama to reveal war plan, bids to sell AmericansObama to reveal war plan, bids to sell Americans Tuesday, December 1, 2009By STEVEN R. HURST, AP WASHINGTON-- President Barack Obama on Tuesday reveals his plan for winning an unpopular 8-year-old war in Afghanistan, embarking on a mission to sell skeptical Americans on the need to put thousands more troops in harm's way and to spend additional billions of taxpayer dollars. After deliberating with his security team for three months, Obama issued new orders to military commanders on Sunday, setting in motion a strategy that may represent a defining decision of his presidency. At least one group of U.S. Marines will be in place by Christmas. The president faces stiff opposition in Congress, where lawmakers control spending for the war effort and many fellow Democrats oppose expanding or even continuing the conflict. While specifics of the new policy have been closely guarded by the White House, others inside the administration have said that Obama has signed off on a step-by-step addition of as many as 35,000 more troops. And comments Monday by White House spokesman Robert Gibbs indicated that Obama will be forward looking in his nationally televised speech at the U.S. Military Academy in West Point, New York. He will focus on the need to protect Afghans from the brutal Taliban insurgency and to train the country's security forces for the day when they assume control of a land that has been at war for 30 years. Obama is not expected to set a deadline for an American withdrawal. "I think there has to be a renewed emphasis on the training of Afghan national security forces," Gibbs said, explaining that the president's plan looked toward to the day when the Afghan army and police would be "primarily responsible" for security. The United States went to war in Afghanistan shortly after the 2001 al-Qaeda terrorist attacks on the United States. Osama bin Laden, leader of the group, and key members of the terrorist organization were headquartered in Afghanistan at the time, taking advantage of sanctuary afforded by the Taliban government that ran the mountainous and isolated country. Taliban forces were quickly driven from power, while bin Laden and his top deputies were believed to have fled into neighboring Pakistan. While the al-Qaeda leadership appears to be bottled up in the rugged mountains, the U.S. military strategy of targeted missile attacks from unmanned drone aircraft has yet to flush bin Laden and his cohort from hiding. That, the administration argues, means the U.S. must continue fighting to prevent the Taliban from regaining control and reopening the country to al-Qaeda."I think what the president will discuss ... is ensuring that we prevent the Taliban from being capable of controlling the government of Afghanistan, as well as incapable of providing safe haven from which al-Qaeda can plot and undertake terrorist activities like we've seen happen previously in the United States," Gibbs said. The escalation of U.S. forces over the coming year would put more than 100,000 American troops in Afghanistan at an annual cost of about $75 billion. Obama notified key administration and military officials of his decision Sunday night and spent the day Monday contacting leaders of key American allies, especially NATO members who have a significant troop commitment in Afghanistan. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown on Monday announced that 500 extra U.K. troops would arrive in southern Afghanistan next month. Britain has taken the lead in lobbying for extra reinforcements for the NATO mission in Afghanistan. Last week, Brown said that NATO nations -- not including the U.S. -- are prepared to offer about 5,000 more troops for Afghanistan. So far, Slovakia has offered 250 extra soldiers, Georgia has pledged between 700 and 1,000 soldiers, and South Korea has said it would send "several hundred" to protect its reconstruction teams. Right now, there are about 71,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan. NATO and other allies collectively have an additional 36,000 troops in the country. While some congressional Democrats are lining up in opposition to an expanded U.S. mission, Republicans have been pressing Obama to move more quickly to meet the request of Afghan commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal who has said the U.S. was headed for defeat without the troop increase. McChrystal issued his report on the Afghan mission in late summer, and -- as administration deliberations dragged on -- he publicly pressed Obama about the need for about 40,000 addition troops. His report was leaked to the Washington Post. After that, former Vice President Dick Cheney accused Obama of "dithering" over the decision. Supporters, however, said Obama was taking the time and care that the former Bush administration should have employed before going to war in Afghanistan and then in Iraq. .msgcontent .wsharing ul li { text-indent: 0; } 分享 Facebook Plurk YAHOO!
